Series Vol. 11 , 13 September 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The study examines the impact of corporate governance on China Petroleum Nation Corporation and compares it with other selected four firms within China and Asia region. The variable identified for measuring corporate performance in this study includes return on Assets, Board size, duality, and interdependence of the board members as of 2022. The impacts of corporate governance on the firms were established through collecting information from the company’s annual reports. The data obtained from the reports have been used for descriptive and correlational analysis. From this study, it has been established that firms within Asia tend to use various elements of structure to determine their performance. The variables used in the analysis, such as duality, the board size, and the interdependence of the board members, had a significant positive relationship with the firm’s performance. The study concluded that company directors should balance critical corporate structure variables to attain high organizational performance. Proper corporate governance has a significant impact on the performance of a company.
board structure, board size, independent directors, film performance
1. Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 74-95.
2. Kyere, M., & Ausloos, M. (2021). Corporate governance and firm’s financial performance in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 1871-1885.
3. Christensen, J., Kent, P., & Stewart, J. (2010). Corporate governance and company performance in Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 20(4), 372– 386.
4. Davidson, R., Goodwin‐Stewart, J., & Kent, P. (2005). Internal governance structures and earnings management. Accounting & Finance, 45(2), 241-267.
5. China National Petroleum Corporation. (2020). Sustainability report 2020. Beijing, China. Retrieved from: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/specials/sasac/CNPC2020CSR.pdf
6. Christopher, J. (2010). Corporate governance. A multi-theoretical approach to recognizing the wider influencing forces impacting organizations. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(8), 683-695.
7. Bhagat. S., & Bolton, B. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance: The sequel. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 142-168.
8. Goodstein, J., Gautam, K. and Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 241–250.
9. Enobakhare, A. (2010). Corporate governance and bank performance in Nigeria. Diss. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch. Retrieved from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1015.3052&rep=rep1&type=pd
10. Arora, A., & Sharma, C. (2016). Corporate governance and firm performance in developing countries: evidence from India. Corporate Governance, 16(2), 420-436.
11. Romano, G., Ferretti, P., & Quirici, M. C. (2012). Corporate Governance and Efficiency of Italian Bank Holding Companies during the financial crisis: an empirical analysis. CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/11568/175583
12. Guo, Z., & Kga, U. K. (2012). Corporate governance and firm performance of listed firms in Sri Lanka. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 664-667.
13. Vo, D., & Phan, T. (2013). Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Economic Development, 7(1), 62-78.
14. Bhaduri, SN & Selarka, E. (2016). Corporate Governance: An overview in corporate governance and corporate social responsibility of Indian companies. Springer, pp. 61-72.
15. Subramanian, S. (2018). Stewardship theory of corporate governance and value system: The case of a family-owned business group in India. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(1), 88-102.
16. Glinkowska, B., & Kaczmarek, B. (2015). Classical and modern concepts of corporate governance (Stewardship Theory and Agency Theory). Management, 19(2), 84.
17. Madhani, P. M. (2017). Diverse roles of the corporate board: Review of various corporate governance theories. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 16(2), 7-28.
18. Yusoff, W. F. W., & Alhaji, I. A. (2012). Insight of corporate governance theories. Journal of Business & Management, 1(1), 52-63.
19. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In Corporate Governance (pp. 77-132). Gower.
20. Balatbat, M. C. A., Taylor, S. L., & Walter, T. S. (2004). Corporate governance, insider ownership and operating performance of Australian initial public offerings. Accounting and Finance, 44(3), 299– 328.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.