Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Series Vol. 15 , 13 September 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
As the performance of BEVs has received increasing attention in recent years as electric vehicles have become hot, the focus of our research is on a series of problems brought about by the over-engineering of EV batteries that are detrimental to the development of EVs including the charging range of EVs and the problem of excessive weight and solutions to make EVs dominate the automotive industry, we use "swap stations" and "mobile with dual charging ports in a platform with adaptive fast charging of multiple battery systems" are two strategies to solve the above problems. As a result, we found a solution to the battery over-engineering problem. In this way, electric vehicles will be able to stand out in the automotive industry and thus increase sales.
EVs, BEVs, Over-engineering, Swap station, Multi-Pack, Automotive industry, Charging time, Battery weight
1. Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, Environmental Concern, and Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 36(1), 70–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251466
2. Han, H., Hsu, L.-T. (Jane), & Sheu, C. (2010). Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities. Tourism Management, 31(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.03.013
3. Huijts, N. M. A., Molin, E. J. E., & Steg, L. (2012). Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018
4. Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48(48), 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009
5. Cushman, F., Sheketoff, R., Wharton, S., & Carey, S. (2013). The development of intent-based moral judgment. Cognition, 127(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.008
6. Vriend, T., Jordan, J., & Janssen, O. (2014). Top or bottom? When/Why bottom ranks elicit more unethical intentions than top/intermediate ranks. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), 10078. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.10078abstract
7. Lai, I., Liu, Y., Sun, X., Zhang, H., & Xu, W. (2015). Factors influencing the behavioural intention towards full electric vehicles: An empirical study in macau. Sustainability, 7(9), 12564–12585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912564
8. Wang, N., & Yan, R. (2015). Research on consumers’ use willingness and opinions of electric vehicle sharing: An empirical study in shanghai. Sustainability, 8(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010007
9. Hartmann, P., Eisend, M., Apaolaza, V., & D’Souza, C. (2017). Warm glow vs. altruistic values: How important is intrinsic emotional reward in proenvironmental behavior? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 52, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.05.006
10. Khairnar, M. (2017). Challenges for battery swapping over Charging stations for EV’s in India? Www.linkedin.com. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/challenges-battery-swapping-over-charging-stations-evs-khairnar
11. Sharma, H. S., Skaper, S. D., & Sharma, A. (2018). Conference report: 184th american association for the advancement of science annual meeting, austin TX, USA feb. 15-19, 2018. CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets, 17(3), 240–242. https://doi.org/10.2174/187152731703180619162802
12. Transport Evolved. (2018). Why hasn’t battery swapping for electric cars caught on yet? In YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPzXzKpv1xY
13. Times, T. B. (2019, July 29). Heavier electric cars wear out roads faster. Www.brusselstimes.com. https://www.brusselstimes.com/61738/heavier-electric-cars-wear-out-roads-faster
14. Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Jacob, D., Taylor, M., Guillén Bolaños, T., Bindi, M., Brown, S., Camilloni, I. A., Diedhiou, A., Djalante, R., Ebi, K., Engelbrecht, F., Guiot, J., Hijioka, Y., Mehrotra, S., Hope, C. W., Payne, A. J., Pörtner, H.-O. ., Seneviratne, S. I., Thomas, A., & Warren, R. (2019). The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C. Science, 365(6459), eaaw6974. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw6974
15. Inkpen, R., & Baily, B. (2019). Environmental beliefs and their role in environmental behaviours of undergraduate students. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 10(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-019-00570-z
16. Taljegard, M., Walter, V., Göransson, L., Odenberger, M., & Johnsson, F. (2019). Impact of electric vehicles on the cost-competitiveness of generation and storage technologies in the electricity system. Environmental Research Letters, 14(12), 124087. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5e6b
17. Pod Point. (2019). Pod-Point.com. https://pod-point.com
18. Shetty, D. K., Shetty, S., Raj Rodrigues, L., Naik, N., Maddodi, C. B., Malarout, N., & Sooriyaperakasam, N. (2020). Barriers to widespread adoption of plug-in electric vehicles in emerging Asian markets: An analysis of consumer behavioral attitudes and perceptions. Cogent Engineering, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1796198
19. Papaoikonomou, K., Latinopoulos, D., Emmanouil, C., & Kungolos, A. (2020). A survey on factors influencing recycling behavior for waste of electrical and electronic equipment in the municipality of volos, greece. Environmental Processes, 7(1), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-019-00399-2
20. Or, T., Gourley, Kaliyappan, K., Yu, A., & Chen, Z. (2020). Recycling of mixed cathode lithium‐ion batteries for electric vehicles: Current status and future outlook. Carbon Energy, 2, 6–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.29
21. Yurdakul, M., & Kazan, H. (2020). Effects of eco-innovation on economic and environmental performance: Evidence from turkey’s manufacturing companies. Sustainability, 12(8), 3167. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083167
22. Iglesias-Émbil, M., Valero, A., Ortego, A., Villacampa, M., Vilaró, J., & Villalba, G. (2020). Raw material use in a battery electric car a thermodynamic rarity assessment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 158, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104820
23. Zeng, B., Luo, Y., Zhang, C., & Liu, Y. (2020). Assessing the Impact of an EV Battery Swapping Station on the Reliability of Distribution Systems. Applied Sciences, 10(22), 8023. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228023
24. Choudhury, P. (Raj), Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. (2020). Work‐from‐anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3251
25. Kamalapathi, K., Srinivasa Rao Nayak, P., & Tyagi, V. K. (2021). Design and implementation of dual‐source charger for EV battery charging. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 31(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/2050-7038.13084
26. Heavy-Duty Electric Vehicles. (2021). Battery Swapping Station - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics. Www.sciencedirect.com. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/battery-swapping-station
27. Aghajan-Eshkevari, S., Azad, S., Nazari-Heris, M., Ameli, M. T., & Asadi, S. (2022). Charging and discharging of electric vehicles in power systems: An updated and detailed review of methods, control structures, objectives, and optimization methodologies. Sustainability, 14(4), 2137. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042137
28. Harris, R. (2022, March 11). How long does it take to charge an electric car? Lease Fetcher. https://www.leasefetcher.co.uk/guides/electric-cars/how-long-does-it-take-to-charge-an-electric-car
29. Yang, Z. (2022, March 21). EV battery swapping was left for dead. now, it’s being revived in china. Protocol. https://www.protocol.com/climate/electric-vehicle-battery-swap-china
30. Lopez, J. (2022, March 24). GM files patent for dual charge port system for evs. Https://Gmauthority.com/Blog/2022/05/Gm-Files-Patent-For-Dual-Charge-Port-System-For-Evs/.
31. Ruiz Romero, J., Rodríguez Bailón, R. M., Moya Morales, M. C., Willis Sánchez, G. B., Aguilar-Luzón, M. del C., Lemus Martín, S. D., Moya Garófano, A., & Romero Sánchez, M. (2022). Mini-cápsulas de formación psicosocial: Aprendiendo psicología social a través del microlearning. Digibug.ugr.es. https://digibug.ugr.es/handle/10481/75145
32. Ramos, A. (2022, July 25). Battery swapping vs. charging: Which is best? MUO. https://www.makeuseof.com/battery-swapping-vs-charging/
33. Li, R., Wang, H., Dai, H., Hong, J., Tong, G., & Chen, X. (2022). Accurate state of charge prediction for real-world battery systems using a novel dual-dropout-based neural network. Energy, 250, 123853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123853
34. Could EV Battery Swapping Replace Charging Stations? (2022, August 1). Energy Matters. http://www.energymatters.com.au/renewable-news/could-ev-battery-swapping-replace-charging-stations/.
35. Hooke, W. (2022, August). Shibboleth authentication request. Login.proxy.lib.duke.edu. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A721244982/ITOF?u=duke_perkins&sid=summon&xid=0ae1422b
36. Islam, S., Iqbal, A., Marzband, M., Khan, I., & Al-Wahedi, A. M. A. B. (2022). State-of-the-art vehicle-to-everything mode of operation of electric vehicles and its future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 166, 112574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112574
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).