Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Series Vol. 1 , 26 April 2021
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Organizational culture and the leader-member exchange (LMX) were two recognized factors that can influence the job satisfactory, working out come and even the success of a modern company. This study aims at investigating how organizational communication can influence the leader-member exchange. By deeply observation and interviewing leaders and members in a Chinese company-Smart Education Company, the study finds out that a powerful but still benevolent boss has the most impact on the exchange process. Other different cultural dimensions can influence the leader-member exchange in different ways. All kings of exchange can be influenced by organizational culture.
Organizational culture, LMX, GLOBE cultural dimensions
1. Erdogan, B., Liden, R. C. and Kraimer, M. L. (2006). Justice and Leader-Member Exchange: The Moderating Role of Organizational Culture. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 395-406.
2. Frey, L. R., Botan, C. H., & Kreps, G. L. (2000).Investigating Communication: An Introduction to Research Method, 2nd Ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
3. Ghosh, A. (2011). Power Distance in Organizational Contexts-A Review of Collectivist Cultures. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 47 (1), online version. Retrieved from : https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-349721390/power-distance-in-organizational-contexts-a-review
4. Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational behavior (vol. 9, pp. 175-208). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
5. Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
6. Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. Garden City, N.Y. : Doubleday.
7. He, D. (2014, Feb 24). Many young workers looking to change job in first quarter. China Daily. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1553144164?accountid=11440
8. House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W. and Gupta. V. (2004): Leadership, culture, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Kang, T. L., & Chang, S. H. (2001). Development of a new three-dimensional leadership mode in technological and vocational education in Taiwan. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 5, 139-146.
10. Keyto., J. (2014). Chapter 22: Organizational culture: creating meaning and influence. In Purnam, L.L and Mumby D. K (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research and Methods (pp. 549-568). USA: Sage.
11. Keyton, J. (2011). Communication and organizational culture: A key to understanding work experiences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Miller, K. (2012). Organizational Communication: Approaches and Processes. Ohio: Wadsworth.
13. Sheer V. C. (2007). The practice of transformational leadership in Chinese culture: Constraints and promises. In M. B. Hinner (Ed.), The influence of culture in the world of business (pp. 249-270). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
14. Sheer V. C. (2012). In Search of Chinese Paternalistic Leadership: Conflicting Evidence From Samples of Mainland China and Hong Kong's Small Family Businesses. Management Communication Quarterly, 27(1), 34-60.
15. Sheer, V. C. (2014). "Exchange lost’’ in leader–member exchange theory and research: A critique and a reconceptualization. Leadership, 0(0), 1–17. doi: 10.1177/1742715014530935
16. Sias, P. M. (2014). Chapter 15: Workplace relationships. In Purnam, L.L and Mumby D. K (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research and Methods (pp. 375-400). USA: Sage.
17. Vukonjanski, J., Nikolic, M., Hadzic, O., Terek, E., & Nedeljkovic, M. (2012). Relationship between GLOBE organizational culture dimensions, job satisfaction and leader-member exchange in serbian organizations. Journal for East European Management Studies, 17(3), 333-368.
18. Wang, G. & Chen, Y.N. (2010). Collectivism, relations, and Chinese communication. Chinese Journal of Communication, 3(1), 1–9.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).