Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Management Research and Economic Development
Series Vol. 19 , 13 September 2023
Open
Access | Article
The Arbitrage Outcome in the Triangular and Quadrangular Arbitrage Paths
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
For a long time, both nationally and internationally, RMB hedging has been a contentious issue. The study and analysis of triangle and quadrilateral hedging in 30 countries are the focus of this article. In addition, they are classified into three groups: industrialized nations, developing countries, and backward countries, with the 30 countries that were chosen falling into each category. On the other hand, triangular arbitrage is an arbitrage that benefits from cross-exchange rate price movements. In contrast, quadrilateral arbitrage follows in the footsteps of those above but involves going via two more countries. Moreover, the data analysis for triangular and quadrangle arbitrage uses the total average, average, maximum, and minimum of favorable spreads, per the study below. From all of this, it could be seen that square hedging frequently has a broader spread or more losses, while triangular hedging frequently has a narrower spread.
Keywords
arbitrage, RMB, triangular hedging, and quadrilateral hedging
References
1. Zhang, B. (2010) RMB appreciation expectations, short-term capital flows, and their impact, International Finance, 4:55-60
2. Wu, S., Ye, L. (2016) A study of two- and three-place hedging - a calculation method based on hedging routes and profit space', Time Finance, 7:282-284
3. Lu, B., Wang, YQ., Hong, SJ. (2020) Expected exchange rate changes of RMB and false trade - an analysis based on the perspective of hedging, Financial Studies, 1:9-27
4. Xu, SQ., Wang, DX. (2012) Analysis of Arbitrage Behavior in Current RMB Cross-Border Settlement, Financial Practice, 1:69-71
5. Ma, N. (2011) Reflections on the teaching of triangular arbitrage, China Foreign Investment, 243:52-53
6. Leng, J. (2013) Analysis of Arbitrage in RMB Cross-border Settlement: Conditions, Methods and Impacts, Business Times, 33: 71-73
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).
- Volume Title
- Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Management Research and Economic Development
- ISBN (Print)
- 978-1-915371-81-2
- ISBN (Online)
- 978-1-915371-82-9
- Published Date
- 13 September 2023
- Series
- Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- ISSN (Print)
- 2754-1169
- ISSN (Online)
- 2754-1177
- DOI
- 10.54254/2754-1169/19/20230115
- Copyright
- 13 September 2023
- Open Access
- This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited