Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Series Vol. 30 , 10 November 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Netflix has issued substantial sums of debt in 2018 and 2019 in order to expand its content library and deal with the intense rivalry that exists in the streaming media sector. The objective of this paper was to investigate the ways in which Netflix's liquidity and costs of financing are impacted by the use of long-term debt financing. The annual reports that Netflix produced from 2017 through 2022 were scrutinized in great detail. According to the findings of this research, Netflix did not experience any liquidity issues in 2018 and 2019 as a result of its long-term debt financing. Therefore, organizations that provide streaming media may utilize long-term debt financing in order to make short-term investments if they managed the due dates of their loan in an appropriate manner. Meanwhile, based on the findings of this study, Netflix was able to reduce the costs associated with debt by issuing debt mostly in euros and using fixed interest rates. When interest rates are forecasted to rise, it may be beneficial for businesses to cut their debt costs by taking on debt denominated primarily in euros and offering fixed interest rates.
Netflix, long-term debt, liquidity, costs of debt
1. China Film News, http://chinafilmnews.cn/, last accessed 2023/4/2
2. Lobato, R.: Netflix Nations: The Geography of Digital Distribution. [Online]. New York: New York University Press (2019).
3. Jenner, M.: Is this TVIV? On Netflix, TVIII and binge-watching. New Media & Society, 18(2), 257–273 (2016).
4. Wayne, M. L.: Netflix, Amazon, and branded television content in subscription video on-demand portals. Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 725–741 (2018).
5. Savitz, E. J.: Netflix Subscriber Growth Could Crush Guidance, Goldman Says -- Barrons.com. New York: Dow Jones & Company Inc (2020).
6. Bradford.: The Netflix effect: A look at coopetition-based business models through Netflix’s charge through France. Strategic Direction. 34(12), 3–5 (2018).
7. Flint, J & Maidenberg, M.: Netflix Subscribers Fall Slightly Short of Expectations; Netflix added 517,000 domestic subscribers in the third quarter as it faces streaming competition from traditional media companies. The Wall Street Journal. Eastern Edition (2019).
8. U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISION, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1065280/000106528019000043/form10k_q418.htm, last accessed 2023/4/2.
9. U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISION, https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1065280/000106528020000040/form10kq419.htm, last accessed 2023/4/2.
10. Team, T.:Trefis: What’s Happening with Netflix Stock? Chatham: Newstex (2020).
11. Badkar, M.: Why investors are disappointed in Netflix. FT.com. n. pag. Print (2016).
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).