Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Series Vol. 50 , 01 December 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Economic mathematical models are essential tools for comprehending intricate economic phenomena, shaping policies, and aiding decision-making. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the positive and negative effects of these models on individuals in the context of economic analysis and decision-making. The benefits of economic mathematical models lie in their ability to enhance understanding through data-driven approaches and advanced algorithms, enabling evidence-based policy formulation and solutions to economic challenges. Moreover, economic models play a crucial role in policy formulation, enabling proactive analysis to minimize unintended consequences and maximize policy effectiveness, benefiting both individuals and society. These models also aid decision-making by providing quantitative frameworks to evaluate different options, reducing uncertainty and risk. However, it is essential to acknowledge the limitations of these models, as they are simplifications of reality and may lead to biases and inaccuracies in predictions and recommendations. Ethical implications arise when decision-makers prioritize economic efficiency over social welfare, potentially leading to unfair outcomes for certain individuals or groups. To address these concerns, this paper presents case studies illustrating the successes and shortcomings of economic models in real-world applications. It also explores alternative methodologies, such as qualitative research and mixed-method approaches, to complement economic analysis. By fostering informed discussions on the appropriate role of economic mathematical models, this research contributes to the development of more equitable and effective economic policies that benefit society as a whole.
economic mathematical models, economic analysis, policy formulation, decision-making
1. Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2011). Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview. Technological and economic development of economy, 17(2), 397-427.
2. Vahidi, A., & Eskandarian, A. (2003). Research advances in intelligent collision avoidance and adaptive cruise control. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 4(3), 143-153.
3. Serafini, P., & Ukovich, W. (1989). A mathematical model for periodic scheduling problems. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 2(4), 550-581.
4. Stern, P. C. (1986). Blind spots in policy analysis: What economics doesn't say about energy use. Journal of Policy Analysis and management, 5(2), 200-227.
5. Padilla-Rivera, A., Russo-Garrido, S., & Merveille, N. (2020). Addressing the social aspects of a circular economy: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(19), 7912.
6. Omar, M. A., & Inaba, K. (2020). Does financial inclusion reduce poverty and income inequality in developing countries? A panel data analysis. Journal of economic structures, 9(1), 37.
7. Bull, J. W., Jobstvogt, N., Böhnke-Henrichs, A., Mascarenhas, A., Sitas, N., Baulcomb, C., ... & Koss, R. (2016). Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats: A SWOT analysis of the ecosystem services framework. Ecosystem services, 17, 99-111.
8. Harou, J. J., Pulido-Velazquez, M., Rosenberg, D. E., Medellín-Azuara, J., Lund, J. R., & Howitt, R. E. (2009). Hydro-economic models: Concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. Journal of Hydrology, 375(3-4), 627-643.
9. Einav, L., & Levin, J. (2014). Economics in the age of big data. Science, 346(6210), 1243089.
10. Feng, T., & Timmermans, H. J. (2014). Trade-offs between mobility and equity maximization under environmental capacity constraints: A case study of an integrated multi-objective model. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 43, 267-279.
11. Doh, S. (2020). Social entrepreneurship and regional economic development: The case of social enterprise in South Korea. Sustainability, 12(21), 8843.
12. Haughton, G. (2021). Environmental justice and the sustainable city. In The Earthscan reader in sustainable cities (pp. 62-79). Routledge.
13. Omar, M. A., & Inaba, K. (2020). Does financial inclusion reduce poverty and income inequality in developing countries? A panel data analysis. Journal of economic structures, 9(1), 37.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).