Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Series Vol. 71 , 18 January 2024
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Compared with relying solely on unfair competition or trademark infringement to maintain brand rights, trademark registration has obvious advantages. It provides statutory protection, ensuring that the rights of trademark owners are guaranteed by law. This registration also grants the exclusive right to use the mark, preventing others from using similar marks that may cause confusion. One of its most important benefits is the presumption of validity in court, thereby putting the onus on the challenger to prove otherwise. Once a trademark is registered, it is protected nationwide, regardless of where it is first used. In the event of infringement, a registered trademark can secure greater damages, potentially deterring illegal use. The enforcement procedure for registered trademarks is more streamlined, which facilitates faster resolution of issues. Registration can be a springboard for international expansion, allowing businesses to register trademarks in other countries more seamlessly. Essentially, for businesses keen to maintain their brand reputation and image, trademark registration is a better choice due to its comprehensive advantages.
Trademark Registration, statutory protection, Trademark, brand reputation
1. Economides, N. S. (1988). The economics of trademarks. Trademark Rep., 78, 523.
2. Dornis, T. W. (2017). Trademark and unfair competition conflicts: Historical-comparative, doctrinal, and economic perspectives (Vol. 34). Cambridge University Press..
3. Cervino, J., & Cubillo, J. M. (2004). A resource-based perspective on global branding: An analysis of trademark registration data. International journal of management, 21(4), 451.
4. Kent, W. C. (1968). Trademarks: Validity of Assignment of Registered Trademark: Requirement of Distinctiveness. Trademark Rep., 58, 378.
5. Belson, J. (2019). Reflections on branding and trade marks: then and now. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 14(8), 601-606.
6. Leaffer, M. A. (1998). The new world of international trademark law. Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev., 2, 1.
7. Bone, R. G. (2019). Rights and Remedies in Trademark Law: The Curious Distinction Between Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition. Tex. L. Rev., 98, 1187.
8. Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2008). Trade rules for the digital age. GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services, 497-529.
9. Bone, R. G. (2004). Enforcement costs and trademark puzzles. Virginia Law Review, 2099-2185.
10. Cao, Y., Ren, S., & Du, M. (2022). Strategic trademark management: a systematic literature review and prospects for future research. Journal of Brand Management, 29(5), 435-453.
11. Bernstein, D. A. (2005). A case for mediating trademark disputes in the age of expanding brands. Cardozo J. Conflict Resol., 7, 139.
12. Lee, T. R., DeRosia, E. D., & Christensen, G. L. (2009). An Empirical and Consumer Psychology Analysis of Trademark Distinctiveness. Ariz. St. LJ, 41, 1033.
13. Long, D. E. (2013). Resolving Trademark Duality in the Twenty-first Century: Making Trademarks Internet-Ready.
14. Gaba, J. (2020). International Trademark Registration. Supremo Amicus, 21, 456.
15. Feng, X. (2008). A brief discussion on the international registration of corporate trademarks and international trademark management strategies. Commercial Research, (1), 8-11.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).