Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Series Vol. 42 , 10 November 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability has become a key concern for businesses and government agencies around the world. Companies are increasingly recognizing that achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) not only has a positive impact on the environment and society, but also has a significant impact on their own performance and competitiveness. Therefore, this thesis aims to explore in depth the impact of SDGs on business performance and analyze the key factors for achieving SDGs. Through comprehensive analysis of relevant literature and case studies, this thesis concludes that actively promoting the realization of SDGs is an effective way to improve corporate performance. In pursuing SDGs, companies can ensure the relevance of their business activities to SDGs through the rational formulation and implementation of sustainability strategies and integrate sustainability into core business decisions and processes. At the same time, enhancing stakeholder engagement is one of the key factors in achieving the SDGs. Working closely with stakeholders, including employees, consumers, suppliers, communities, and governments, can help companies gain broader support and cooperation to jointly drive sustainability. In summary, the findings of this thesis suggest that actively promoting the achievement of SDGs is critical to improving business performance. To successfully achieve SDGs, companies need to develop and implement sustainability strategies, enhance stakeholder engagement, and adopt innovative business models and technology solutions. This will provide companies with a long-term sustainable competitive advantage and make a positive contribution to society and the environment.
sustainable development goals, corporate performance, innovative business model, success factors, social responsibility
1. Albareda, L., Lozano, J.M. & Ysa, T. Public Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Governments in Europe. J Bus Ethics 74, 391–407 (2007). DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9514-1
2. Rodrigo Lozano, Kim Ceulemans, Carol Scarff Seatter. Teaching organisational change management for sustainability: designing and delivering a course at the University of Leeds to better prepare future sustainability change agents, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 106, 2015, Pages 205-215, ISSN 0959-6526, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.031.
3. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222-237. DOI: 10.1002/bse.682
4. Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Haanaes, K., Reeves, M., & Goh, E. (2013). The innovation bottom line. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(3), 29-36. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/the-innovation-bottom-line/
5. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
6. Russo, M. V., & Perrini, F. (2010). Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 207-221. DOI:10.1007/s10551-009-0079-z
7. Clarkson, M. B., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 303-327. DOI:10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003
8. PwC. (2018). SDG Reporting Challenge 2018: Is Business Responding? Retrieved from SDG Reporting Challenge 2018. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/sustainability/SDG/sdg-reporting-2018.pdf
9. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate Reputation and Social Performance: The Importance of Fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435-455. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00597.x
10. Unilever. (n.d.). Unilever Sustainable Living Plan: Progress Report 2019.
11. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736. DOI: 10.2307/1556363
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).