Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Series Vol. 48 , 01 December 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
With the continuous development of the internet and its related industries, the internet is constantly popularized in residents' daily life. Therefore, the development and progressive prospects of internet technology companies are significant for investors. However, little research is concentrating on the strategy of investing in the technology sector and its corresponding development. Therefore, the research theme of this paper is to take Apple Inc. as an example to analyze the development trend and corresponding investment strategies of internet technology companies. This paper uses the stock data of the top 30 companies ranked in market value in the technology sector in the past eight years and analyzes the data with a momentum strategy model. This paper finds that the internet technology company and its corresponding technology field will continue to develop and grow. Apple Inc. has gained a leading position in this field through its innovative products and technologies. Additionally, the momentum strategy has higher returns after improvement and application in science and technology. In the future, with continuous development in science and technology, the corresponding investment in this field will be further profitable.
Apple inc, momentum strategy, stock analysis, internet science and technology sector
1. Zuo, L., Li, H., Gao, H. and Zhu, M. (2022). Sustainable improvement of efficiency of Internet companies in the context of digital transformation. Sustainability, 14(9), 5600.
2. Faghih, N., Dastourian, B., Sajadi, S. M., Henten, A. and Foroudi, P. (2018). A business model framework for strategic innovation in ICT firms: the importance of information. The Bottom Line, 31(1), 16-41.
3. Aydoğan, F. (2022). Digital Citizenship: Beyond Big Data, technical skills, Industry 4.0 and COVID-19. Omics : A Journal of Integrative Biology, 26(11), 589-593.
4. Gao, H. and Chen, D. (2023) The Analysis of the Effectiveness of China Science and Technology Board Market [J]. Hebei Finance , No.548(04), 32-38.
5. Li, Q., Chen, J. and Zhang, H. (2023) Research on stock market liquidity and Enterprise Innovation based on Science and Technology Board listed enterprises [J/OL]. Operation and Management, 1-10.
6. Dobrolyubova, E. (2021). Measuring outcomes of digital transformation in public administration: Measuring the outcomes of the digital transformation of public administration: a literature review and possible steps forward. Network of colleges and Schools of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe. the NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(1), 61-86.
7. Hamdouch, A. and Samuelides, E. (2001). The innovation dynamics of mobile phone services in France. European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(3), 153-162.
8. Yang, Y. (2022). The rise and fall of mobile phone companies: an analysis of competitive advantage based on patents. Contemporary Management Research, 18(2), 133-163.
9. Kasperek, D., Antonowicz, P., Baranowski, M., Sokolowska, M. and Podpora, M. (2023). Usability comparison of Apple M2 and M1 processors for various machine learning tasks. Sensors, 23(12), 5424.
10. Edwards, J. (2019). Signal Processing Drives Consumer electronics: New research influences and improves how users interact with mobile and wearable devices in their daily lives [Special Report]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 36(3), 12-15.
11. Guo, J., Zhang, Y. and Cao, C. (2022). Research on the driving path of ambidextrous innovation in science and technology enterprises: An exploration based on qualitative comparative analysis of fuzzy sets. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022.
12. Tuna, G. and Yildiz, S. (2016). The impact of operating expenditure on corporate performance in Turkey: evidence from the technology sector. Ekonomika, 62(4), 1-15.
13. Louis K. C. C., Jegadeesh, N. and Lakonishok, J. (1996). Momentum Strategies. The Journal of Finance, 51(5), 1681–1713.
14. Mickiewicz, B. and Volkava, K. (2022). Digital economy development status, evaluation and direction. VUZF Review, 7(2), 78-87.
15. Sadhwani, R. and Bhayo, M. U. R. (2021). Momentum and disposition effect in the US stock market. Cogent Economics and Finance, 9(1)
16. Huang, X., Song, X. and Hu, X. (2018). Does “Internet plus” promote new export space for firms? evidence from china. China and World Economy, 26(6), 50-71.
17. Crass, D., Czarnitzki, D. and Toole, A. A. (2019). The dynamic relationship between investments in brand equity and firm profitability: Evidence using trademark registrations. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 26(1), 157-176.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).