Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business and Policy Studies

Series Vol. 71 , 18 January 2024


Open Access | Article

Sustainability Management: A Review of ESG Principles and Policies in Investment

Sing On Lo * 1
1 Xi’an Jiaotong Liverpool University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, Vol. 71, 62-68
Published 18 January 2024. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Sing On Lo. Sustainability Management: A Review of ESG Principles and Policies in Investment. AEMPS (2024) Vol. 71: 62-68. DOI: 10.54254/2754-1169/71/20241422.

Abstract

Since numerous nations commit to achieving carbon neutrality by 2050, there is a need to examine the implications of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles on investment decisions. This research emphases on the violation of investment principles regarding ESG factors, specifically in relation to the maximisation of shareholders' wealth. Additionally, this paper explores the reasons behind banks considering the cessation of investments in corporations that have pledged to cut carbon emissions, despite the evidence of a positive correlation between sustainable management and stock performance. Moreover, there are concerns among many that ESG practises may be fraudulent and merely a form of greenwashing, lacking the ability to convince shareholders to consider sustainability. In this study, the primary challenges that arise in relation to ESG factors are considered, and the author also assesses the insufficient outcomes in this field that necessitate additional investigation into the actual effectiveness of ESG in promoting sustainability. ESG framework offers long-term benefits to both shareholders and stakeholders, as opposed to focusing on short-term outcomes and results. It is essential to demonstrate the significance of ESG practises and results in order to prove their value to investors. While ESG firms are more likely to withstand challenging circumstances, they may not necessarily outperform other stocks in a thriving macroeconomy.

Keywords

ESG, Greenwashing, Investing, Sustainability, Stakeholder Capitalism

References

1. Pigou, A.C. (1948) The Economics of Welfare. Transaction Publishers.

2. Cheung, K. (2022) Dr. Oz’s Scientific Experiments Killed Over 300 Dogs, Entire Litter of Puppies. Jezebel. https://jezebel.com/dr-oz-s-scientific-experiments-killed-over-300-dogs-e-1849609272.

3. Lloyd, A. (2023) Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson and Oprah Winfrey face backlash for asking fans to donate to Maui fund instead of contributing more themselves. Insider. https://www.insider.com/dwayne-the-rock-johnson-oprah-winfrey-backlash-maui-wildfire-fund-2023-9.

4. What really happened at VW. (2017) The Economist. https://www.economist.com/books-and-arts/2017/06/01/what-really-happened-at-vw.

5. Lund, D.S. (2021) Corporate Political Spending Is Bad Business. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/01/corporate-political-spending-is-bad-business.

6. Nodoph, L. (2023) Whitepaper: The cost of greenwashing. Makersite GmbH. https://makersite.io/insights/whitepaper-the-cost-of-greenwashing/.

7. Swanson, B. (2023) Do ESG Funds Have Higher ESG Scores? CFA Institute Enterprising Investor. https://blogs.cfainstitute.org/investor/2023/03/31/do-esg-funds-have-higher-esg-scores/#:~:text=Investors%20pay%2040%25%20higher%20fees,scores%2C%20they%20should%20think%20again.

8. Bebchuk, L.A., Kastiel, K. and Tallarita, R. (2022) Stakeholder Capitalism in the Time of COVID. Yale Journal on Regulation, 40, 60-126.

9. ESG assets may hit $53 trillion by 2025, a third of global AUM | Insights | Bloomberg Professional Services. (2021) Bloomberg Professional Services. https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/blog/esg-assets-may-hit-53-trillion-by-2025-a-third-of-global-aum/.

10. Broadstock, D.C., Chan, K., Cheng, L.T. and Wang, X. (2021) The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101716.

11. Showstack, R. (2017) IPCC Chair Discusses Limiting Global Warming to 1.5°C. Eos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017eo085897.

12. Am, J.B., Doshi, V., Noble, S. and Malik, A. (2023) Consumers care about sustainability and back it up with their wallets. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/consumers-care-about-sustainability-and-back-it-up-with-their-wallets.

13. Talan G and Sharma G.D. (2019) Doing Well by Doing Good: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda for Sustainable Investment. Sustainability, 11(2), 353.

14. Lisin, A., Kushnir, A., Koryakov, A.G., Fomenko, N. and Shchukina, T. (2022). Financial Stability in Companies with High ESG Scores: Evidence from North America Using the Ohlson O-Score. Sustainability, 14(1), 479.

15. Fulton, M., Kahn, B.M. and Sharples, C. (2012) Sustainable Investing: Establishing Long-Term Value and Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2222740.

16. Atz, U., Van Holt, T. and Liu, Z.Z. (2020) Do Corporate Sustainability and Sustainable Finance Generate Better Financial Performance? A Review and Meta-analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3708495.

17. Tina Smith. (2020) Murray, Smith urge labor department to withdraw proposal that would discourage financial advisors from supporting racial justice. In Tina Smith U.S. Senator for Minnesota. Retrieved October 28, 2023, from https://www.smith.senate.gov/murray-smith-urge-labor-department-to-withdraw-proposal-that-would-discourage-financial-advisors-from-supporting-racial-justice/.

18. Celarier, M. (2023) The Backlash Against ESG Faces Its Own Backlash. Institutional Investor. https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/2bstpo0h7569w263f3w1s/culture/the-backlash-against-esg-faces-its-own-backlash.

19. Pineau, E., Le, P. and Estran, R. (2022) Importance of ESG factors in sovereign credit ratings. Finance Research Letters, 49, 102966.

20. Welch, K. and Yoon, A. (2022) Do high-ability managers choose ESG projects that create shareholder value? Evidence from employee opinions. Review of Accounting Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09701-4.

21. Ermakova, A., Finogenova, Y. and Subbota, K. (2023) Assessment of industry specifics impact on the ESG rating among russian companies. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 23, 53-71.

22. Lang, T. (n.d.) ESG by MSCI: An example of how NOT to invest sustainably. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/esg-msci-example-how-invest-sustainably-tillmann-lang.

23. Khan, M., Serafeim, G. and Yoon, A. (2015) Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2575912.

24. Nazarova, V.V., Churakova, I.Y., Sergachev, B.D. and Orekhovskaya, M.A. (2023) Responsible and profitable: How does ESG agenda increases company’s evaluation. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management, 22(2), 226-248.

25. Qin, K. (2022) ESG Rating, Investor Attention, and Stock Returns in China. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312543.

26. Horn, M. (2023). The Influence of ESG Ratings On Idiosyncratic Stock Risk: The Unrated, the Good, the Bad, and the Sinners. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 75(3), 415-442.

27. Glück, M., Hübel, B. and Scholz, H. (2021) ESG Rating Events and Stock Market Reactions. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3803254.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business and Policy Studies
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-281-7
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-282-4
Published Date
18 January 2024
Series
Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
ISSN (Print)
2754-1169
ISSN (Online)
2754-1177
DOI
10.54254/2754-1169/71/20241422
Copyright
18 January 2024
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated