Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Series Vol. 71 , 18 January 2024
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The gender wage gap is a critical measurement of gender equality in the labor market. On the demand side in the labor market, gender differences in labor pricing can shape the household decision regarding intra-household resource allocation. Understanding how labor pricing, namely wages, affects the resources allocated to women is important to improve women’s welfare in developing countries. Previous research focuses on the effects of gender norms in China, such as son preferences, on intra-household resource allocation. This paper examines how the gender wage gap affects the resources allocated to women within the household. To capture the wage shock in the labor market, I construct the gender- specific Bartik variables. The results indicate that the increases in female-to-male wages between couples improve women’s nutrition intake. This work serves to inform about improving women’s welfare in the family and labor market.
Gender wage gap, intro-household resources allocation, Bartik variable
1. BLAU F D, KAHN L M. The gender wage gap: extent, trends, and explanations [J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2017, 55 (3): 789-865.
2. ZHANG Fen, HE Wei The Impact of Family Factors on Gender Wage Differentials: Empirical Analysis Based on CFPS Data [J] POPULATION & ECONOMICS ,2021(2):84- 102
3. World Economic Forum. The global gender gap report [R], 2017.
4. WEI Wei, YUE Chang-jun Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Market [J] Economics of Education Research 2006(12)1-25
5. Shenhav, N. a. "Lowering standards to wed? Spouse quality, marriage, and labor market responses to the gender wage gap." Review of Economics and Statistics (2021) 103(2): 265-279.
6. Bailey, Martha J. "More power to the pill: The impact of contraceptive freedom on women's life cycle labor supply." The quarterly journal of economics 121, no. 1 (2006): 289-320.
7. Bacolod, M. P. and B. S. Blum. "Two sides of the same coin: US “residual” inequality and the gender gap." Journal of Human Resources (2010)45(1): 197-242.
8. Aizer, A. "The gender wage gap and domestic violence." American Economic Review (2010) 100(4): 1847-1859.
9. Duncan Thomas, Intra-Household Resource Allocation: an Inferential Approach, Journal of Human Resources,(1990) Vol.25(4),pp.635-664.
10. Li, L. and X. Wu. "Gender of children, bargaining power, and intrahousehold resource allocation in China." Journal of Human Resources (2011) 46(2): 295-316.
11. Brown, W. and D. Nash (2008). "What has been happening to collective bargaining under New Labour? Interpreting WERS 2004." Industrial Relations Journal 39(2): 91-103.
12. Folbre, N. (1984). "Household production in the Philippines: A non-neoclassical approach." Economic Development and Cultural Change 32(2): 303-330.
13. Nikièma, B., et al. (2008). "Women bargaining to seek healthcare: norms, domestic practices, and implications in rural Burkina Faso." World Development 36(4): 608-624.
14. Von Braun, J. (1988). "Effects of technological change in agriculture on food consumption and nutrition: rice in a West African setting." World Development 16(9): 1083-1098.
15. Chau, T. W., et al. (2007). "Testing the collective model of household labor supply: Evidence from China." China Economic Review 18(4): 389-402. https://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/china
16. Bartik, T. J. (1991). "Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?".
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).