Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Series Vol. 23 , 13 September 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nowadays, ESG investment, which involves environmental (E), social (S) and governance (G) elements, become a hit. Not only the leader of companies but also the public were attracted by such investments aimed at long-term benefits. However, at present, there exist many problems with ESG investment, such as, lack of standard, return, and supervision for it. At the same time, with the development of economy and social concept, corporations increasingly play a greater role in society. As a result, corporations are expected to assume a series of social responsibilities by the public. ESG investment and corporate social responsibilities, obviously the two concepts have something in common. Therefore, the paper focuses on the two concepts and tries to answer ESG-related problems from the perspective of corporate social responsibilities. First, through the analysis and summary of relevant research, the paper concludes the relationship between the two. Second, through data analysis and case studies, the paper explores the benefits of ESG investment if it embodies the assumption of corporate social responsibility. Last, the paper concludes with what and how we should do to promote ESG investment for the purpose of making companies assume more social responsibility.
ESG investment, corporate social responsibilities, social welfare, economic law, insurance
1. Huang Shizhong.(2021). ESG concept and the restatement of coporate report. Finance and Accounting(17), 3-10.
2. Markus Kitzmueller and Jay Shimshack. (2012). Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature(1), 51-84.
3. Sheldon, O. (1924). The Philosophy of Management. Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons Ltd, London
4. Institute AL. (1992). Principles of corporate governance : analysis and recommendations : proposed final draft (March 31, 1992). American Law Institute.
5. Li heng and Huang Xue. (2015). Research on the theory of coporate social reponsibility and its impetus. Sichuan University Press, Chengdu..
6. Gunnar Friede, Timo Busch and Alexander Bassen. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment(4), 210-233.
7. Paul C. Godfrey. (2005). The Relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective. The Academy of Management Review(4), 777-798.
8. Nie Huihua, Lin Jiani and Cui Mengying. (2022). ESG: The proper way for a company to promote common prosperity. Study and Explore(11), 107-116+2.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).