Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Series Vol. 64 , 28 December 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
In three different ways, this article provides insight into how the presentation of artwork reflects the changing stages of the economy. The article delves into the historical significance of the Dutch Golden Age, where artistic opulence went hand in hand with economic prosperity. In addition, it dissects the broader stages of economic development and their reflection in art from ancient agrarian societies to today's digital age. Finally, the article explores the evolving patterns of transactions in the art market, tracing the shift from barter systems to modern digital transactions. Through these lenses, the article shows that the art market can serve as a dynamic indicator of economic change, providing insight into social values, economic health, and the evolving interplay between culture and commerce. The economic crisis of 2008 and the potential dangers of the fine art market are examined. The future use of market trends as a starting point for econometric measurements was envisaged.
Art Market, Economics, art valuation, financial downturns
1. Luc Renneboog, Christophe Spaenjers, Buying Beauty: On prices and returns in the art market, 2012.
2. Simona Botti, ‘what role for marketing in the Art? An analysis of arts consumption and artistic value’, international journal of arts management, 2000, page 14-27.
3. Maarten Prak, Guilds and the development of the art market during the Dutch golden age, simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art, 2003, page 236-251.
4. Dániel Margócsy, ‘commercial visions, science, trade, and visual culture in the Dutch golden age’, university of Chicago press, 2014.
5. Michael North, ‘Art and commerce in the Dutch golden age’, new heaven London Yale university press, 1997.
6. Michael Hutter, Richard Shusterman, ‘Handbook of the economics of art and culture’, chapter 6 value and the valuation of art in economic and aesthetic theory, page 169-208, 2006.
7. Roman Kräussl, Thorsten Lehnert, Nicolas Martelin, Is there a bubble in the art market?, journal of empirical finance, 2016, page 99-109.
8. Oliver Chanel is art market behavior predictable?, European economic review, 1995, page 519-527.
9. moshenska Gabriel, the market for ancient art, university college London, 2017.
10. Neil De Marchi, Hans J. Van Miegroet, Handbook of the economics of art and culture, chapter 3 the history of Art Markets, 2006, page 69-122
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).