Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Series Vol. 64 , 28 December 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The Black Scholes model and binomial tree model have been the main research objects of scholars in the past fifty years. This article summarizes the optimization process of these two classic option pricing models to understand the different directions of optimizing the models and to provide ideas for future model improvement. Improvements from scholars to the Black-Scholes model mainly focus on the basic model and the relevant variables involved in option pricing, while the optimization of the binomial tree model focuses on the reduction of pricing errors as well as the improvement of model fitting speed. Empirical studies of option pricing models have shown that improved models while enhancing the accuracy of pricing in various financial markets, unavoidably increase computational complexity and reduce efficiency. This article also demonstrates the future integration of financial derivatives pricing models in multiple fields by describing the application of real options in the agriculture, technology, and biology industries.
Black-Scholes model, Binomial tree model, Real option
1. Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1086/260062
2. Kou, S. G. (2002). A jump-diffusion model for option pricing. Management Science, 48(8), 1086–1101. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1086.166
3. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
4. Menn, C., & Rachev, S. T. (2005). A GARCH option pricing model with α-stable innovations. European Journal of Operational Research, 163(1), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.009
5. Kim, Y. S., Rachev, S. T., Bianchi, M. L., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2008). Financial market models with Lévy processes and time-varying volatility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(7), 1363–1378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.11.004
6. Duffee, G. R. (2002). Term Premia and interest rate forecasts in affine models. The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 405–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00426
7. Grünbichler, A., & Longstaff, F. A. (1996). Valuing futures and options on volatility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(6), 985–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(95)00034-8
8. Peiris, S., & Thavaneswaran, A. (2007). An introduction to volatility models with indices. Applied Mathematics Letters, 20(2), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2006.04.001
9. Cox, J. C., & Ross, S. A. (1976). The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(1–2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90023-4
10. Hull, J., & White, A. (1988). The use of the control variate technique in option pricing. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23(3), 237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331065
11. Ritchken, P. (1995). On pricing barrier options. The Journal of Derivatives, 3(2), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.1995.407939
12. Figlewski, S., & Gao, B. (1999). The adaptive mesh model: A new approach to efficient option pricing. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(3), 313–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(99)00024-0
13. Boyle, P. P. (1988). A lattice framework for option pricing with two state variables. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331019
14. Jin, X. (2011). Valuation of single patent in patent Asset Securitization based on real options. Statistics and decision, 52-55. Doi: CNKI: SUN: TJJC. 0.2011-04-014.
15. Kamrad, B., & Ritchken, P. (1991). Multinomial approximating models for options with K state variables. Management Science, 37(12), 1640–1652. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.12.1640
16. Levy, H., & Byun, Y. H. (1987). An empirical test of the black-scholes option pricing model and the implied variance: A confidence interval approach. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 2(4), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x8700200403
17. Corrado, C., & Su, T. (1998). An empirical test of the hull-white option pricing model. Journal of Futures Markets, 18(4), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9934(199806)18:4<363::aid-fut1>3.0.co;2-k
18. Saurabha, R., & Tiwari, M. (2007). Empirical study of the effect of including skewness and kurtosis in Black Scholes option pricing formula on S&P CNX nifty index options. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1075583
19. De Andrés-Sánchez, J. (2017). An empirical assestment of Fuzzy Black and Scholes pricing option model in spanish stock option market. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 33(4), 2509–2521. https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-17719
20. Bailey, W., & Stulz, R. M. (1989). The pricing of stock index options in a general equilibrium model. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2330744
21. Yung, H. H., & Zhang, H. (2003). An empirical investigation of the GARCH option pricing model: Hedging performance. Journal of Futures Markets, 23(12), 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.10109
22. Kim, N., & Lee, J. (2013). No-arbitrage implied volatility functions: Empirical evidence from KOSPI 200 index options. Journal of Empirical Finance, 21, 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2012.12.007
23. Li, O. X., & Li, W. (2014). Hedging jump risk, expected returns and risk premia in jump-diffusion economies. Quantitative Finance, 15(5), 873–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2014.946439
24. Xu, Z. & Zheng, F. (2015). Real option pricing method of rural collective operational construction. land use right. The rural economy, 36 to 40. Doi: CNKI: SUN: NCJJ. 0.2015-06-007.
25. Kellogg, D., & Charnes, J. M. (2000). Real-options valuation for a biotechnology company. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(3), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v56.n3.2362
26. Liu, G., Zou, J. & Chen, C. (2004). An option pricing model with multiple jump processes. Number. of economic and technical economic studies, 106-110. The doi: CNKI: SUN: SLJY. 0.2004-04-017.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).