Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Series Vol. 54 , 01 December 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This research paper delves into the intrinsic dynamics of the anchoring effect as it pertains to corporate engagement in green governance. The findings underscore two distinct phenomena: firstly, in the presence of solely an internal anchor, there is a marked internal anchoring effect. This indicates a direct correlation between the magnitude of a focus firm's expenditure and its green outlay. Conversely, when only influenced by an external anchor, there emerges a pronounced externality among companies affiliated with Global Prime Partners (GPP). Specifically, a prior heightened expenditure on environmental initiatives is indicative of potential benefits reaped from anchoring in the realm of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) strategies. This paper further elucidates the implications of these anchoring effects on decision-making processes and offers strategic insights into harnessing their inherent advantages.
cognitive bias, the anchoring effect, ESG, and green finance
1. Canaman, D. (2011). Thinking, both fast and slow. Macmillan Publishing Co.
2. Tversky A., & Kananeman, Inc., D.(1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and bias. Science, 185 (4157), 1124-1131.
3. Mr.Li, K.(2019). The effect of the anchor bias in the ESG investment. The Journal of Wealth Management, 22 (2), 35-47.
4. Gunder, Kang, N., & Moon, J.(2020). Anchoring effect in the ESG rating. The Journal of Business Ethics, 166 (1), 133-151.
5. Ghani, E., & Nanda, V. (2018). Anchoring and adjustment deviations in the ESG ratings. The Journal of Business Ethics, pages 152 (1), pages 183-204.
6. Rashīd, A.A., Carriapo, M.S., & Lada,S. (2020). Anchor ESG investment: examines the impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) rating agencies. Cleaner Production Magazine, 256, 120414.
7. Chen Zhiyong, & Zhang Zhiyong. (2020). Fixed bias in corporate sustainability ratings: evidence from CSR ratings. Accounting and Finance, 60 (4), 3481-3506.
8. Johnson, J., & Nelson, H. (2020). Anchoring and frame effects in ESG ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment, Issue 29 (4), 1554-1569.
9. KPMG International Co., Ltd. (2018). The KPMG 2017 Corporate Responsibility Report Survey. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2018/10/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2017.pdf.
10. BlackRock Inc. (2020). Sustainable investment: the resilience generated in the uncertainty. Retrieved from https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/literature/publication/blk-esg-investing-resilience-amid-uncertainty.pdf.
11. Alice, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2003). "Coherence and arbitrariness": a stable demand curve without stable preferences. Economics Quarterly, 118 (1), 73-106. doi: 10.1162/00335530360535153.
12. Arily, D., & Weltenbroke, K. (2002). Procraay, deadlines, and performance: self-control through advance commitment. In Psychological Science, 13 (3), 219-224. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00441.
13. Camakal, USSR, & Schiff, B.(2015). "Suggestive" pricing: the impact of pricing complexity on consumer choice. The Journal of Consumer Research, 42 (5), 685-701. doi: 10.1093/jcr/ucv037.
14. Kurt, K.S., And Kurt, & R.A. (2005). Size matters: the impact of font size on online consumers. The Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15 (1), 77-83. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp150111.
15. Thomas, M., Semon, D.H., & Kadiali, V. (2007). Price precision effect: evidence from laboratory and market data. The Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (1), 95-102. doi: 10.1086/517541.
16. Sen, A.M.,& Levin, P.F. (1972). Feeling good affects help: cookies and kindness. The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21 (3), 384-388. doi: 10.1037/h0032317.
17. Guo F. (2023). ESG Performance, Institutional Investors and Corporate Risktaking: Empirical Evidence from China. Wuhan Zhicheng Times Cultural Development Co., Ltd. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Business, Economics, Management Science (BEMS 2023).
18. Rupamanjari R S, & Sandeep G. (2023). Impact of ESG score on financial performance of Indian firms: static and dynamic panel regression analyses. Applied Economics, 55 (15).
19. Yonghui L, Tao Y, Yiyang Z, et al. (2023). How does corporate ESG performance affect bond credit spreads: Empirical evidence from China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 85.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).