Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Series Vol. 50 , 01 December 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The news of Microsoft spending huge amount of money doing acquisition of Activision Blizzard shocked many game players. It was questioned by people. Why did Microsoft choose to acquire Blizzard under the condition that Blizzard seemed going downhill with its management and was stuggled with its employee sexual harrasement scandal? Why is Blizzard still worth so much value for Microsoft? What can Blizzard bring to Microsoft and what are the risks? Is the real purpose of such a big action by Microsoft just to expand its gaming business? Is the “metaverse” mentioned in Microsoft's announcement the real mission? This article is going to use the SWOT analysis to fully analyze Blizzard's own strengths and weaknesses, and to discover what kind of opportunities and threats it can bring to Microsoft in the industry it is in, to explore the things behind the game itself, but the key to open the door of the possibility and the success of a new area.
Microsoft, Blizzard, SWOT, clouds, Metaverse
1. Microsoft News Center. (2022). Microsoft to Acquire Activision Blizzard to Bring the Joy and Community of Gaming to Everyone, across Every Device. Retrieved from news.microsoft.com/2022/01/18/microsoft-to-acquire-activision-blizzard-to-bring-the-joy-and-community-of-gaming-to-everyone-across-every-device/.
2. Jie, H., Wu, C. (2023). Microsoft's Acquisition of Activision Blizzard: A Case Study. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management. 7. 363-371.
3. Blizzard Entertainment. (2021). Reimagining BlizzCon. - BlizzCon - Blizzard News. Retrieved from news.blizzard.com/en-us/blizzcon/23738004/reimagining-blizzcon.
4. Puyt, R., Lie, F., Wilderom, C. (2023). The Origins of SWOT Analysis. Long Range Planning, 56(3), 102304, 1.
5. Hood, A., Kotick, B., Nadella, S., Spencer, P. (2022). Microsoft & Activision Blizzard. Retrieved from https://investor.activision.com/static-files/180f309f-89e2-4fb8-a98d-b527edfdaf46
6. Buijsman, M. (2022). The Top 10 Public Game Companies Generated $126 Billion In 2021 as Subscriptions and M&A Shake Up the Market. Retrieved from newzoo.com/resources/blog/the-top-10-public-game-companies-generated-126-billion-in-2021-as-subscriptions-and-ma-shake-up-the-market.
7. McKenna, B., Gardner, L., Myers, M. (2010). Chaotic Worlds: An Analysis of World of Warcraft.. 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems 2010, AMCIS 2010. 5. 174.
8. Curry, D. (2023). Candy Crush Revenue and Usage Statistics (2023).Retrieved from www.businessofapps.com/data/candy-crush-statistics/#:~:text=While%20andy%20Crush%20is%20not,the%20game%20for%20returning%20players.
9. Liao, S. (2021). At Blizzard, Groping, Free-Flowing Booze and Fear of Retaliation Tainted ‘magical’ Workplace. The Washington Post, WP Company, 6. Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/video-games/2021/08/06/blizzard-culture-sexual-harassment-alcohol/.
10. Blackclaude. (2022). Overwatch 2: Blizzard Devs ‘upset and Annoyed’ by Delays. IGN Southeast Asia. Retrieved from sea.ign.com/overwatch-2/184446/news/overwatch-2-blizzard-devs-upset-and-annoyed-by-delays.
11. Clement, J. (2023). U.S. Best Selling Games 2022. Statista. Retrieved from www.statista.com/statistics/1285658/top-ranked-video-games-sales-annual/.
12. Bass, D., Chang, C. (2021). Microsoft Tests Its Own Corporate Metaverse for Early 2022 Launch. Bloomberg.Com, Bloomberg,. Retrieved from www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-11-02/microsoft-s-own-metaverse-is-coming-and-it-will-have-powerpoint.
13. Wang, J., Li, J., Huang, J. (2022). Research on Risks of Chinese Internet Enterprise’s Overseas Mergers and Acquisitions Based on Tencent’s Typical Case. Journal of Asia-Pacific and European Business, Vol. 2 No.01.
14. Song, W., Liu, F., Xing, X. (2023). Rsearch on Metaverse Business Model Innovation. Foreign Economics and Management, 45(07):18-35.
15. Milovanov, A., Rasmussen, J., Groslambert, B. (2021). Black swans, extreme risks, and the e-pile model of self-organized criticality, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Volume 144, 110665.
16. Quattrone, P. (2021). Seeking Transparency Makes One Blind: How to Rethink Disclosure, Account for Nature and Make Corporations Sustainable. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(2), 547–566.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).