Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Management Research and Economic Development

Series Vol. 87 , 07 June 2024


Open Access | Article

Research on the Impact of High-Tech Enterprise Certification Policy on Corporate Technological Innovation: An Empirical Study Based on Listed Company Data

Haocheng Zan * 1
1 School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210016, China

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, Vol. 87, 9-23
Published 07 June 2024. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Haocheng Zan. Research on the Impact of High-Tech Enterprise Certification Policy on Corporate Technological Innovation: An Empirical Study Based on Listed Company Data. AEMPS (2024) Vol. 87: 9-23. DOI: 10.54254/2754-1169/87/20240789.

Abstract

This study utilizes a variety of models testing for robustness, such as the PSM-DID approach, by analyzing market data from publicly traded companies over the period 2006 to 2022, while omitting any instances suspected of manipulating research and development activities. It delves into how the policy for certifying high-technology companies in China influences their innovative processes. Findings indicate that certification as a high-technology business significantly fosters innovation among Chinese firms, notably in the realm of inventing new patents. Such certification enhances company innovation both directly and indirectly. It is observed that, in comparison to major state-owned corporations, smaller private firms and those driven by shareholder incentives gain more advantages from being recognized as high-tech enterprises. This investigation adds to the academic discourse by offering an empirical analysis of China's policies aimed at bolstering innovation, thereby enabling a deeper insight into the factors propelling company innovation and the complex dynamics between government incentive programs and corporate innovative activities.

Keywords

High-tech enterprise certification, Mathematical statistics, Robustness test, PSM-DID

References

1. Jiang, L. C. (2008). On the technical innovation in the development process of Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises—Problems and strategic choices. Journal of Guiyang College (Natural Science Edition), 3(04), 16-23. DOI: 10.16856/j.cnki.52-1142/n.2008.04.005.

2. Shi, B., & Fang, J. H. (2022). Evaluation of the innovation effect of “high-tech enterprise certification”—Based on empirical evidence from fuzzy breakpoint regression. Journal of Shanghai Business School, 23(02), 60-74. DOI: 10.19941/j.cnki.cn31-1957/f.2022.02.005.

3. David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 497-529.

4. Yu, M. G., Fan, R., & Zhong, H. J. (2016). China’s industrial policy and enterprise technological innovation. China Industrial Economics, No. 345(12), 5-22. DOI: 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.

5. Yang, G., Liu, J., Lian, P., & Yan, M. (2017). Tax preferences, R&D manipulation and R&D performance. Economic Research Journal, 52(08), 110-124.

6. Xu, L. L. (2017). High-tech enterprise certification, political connections and technological innovation of private enterprises. Management Review, 29(09), 84-94. DOI: 10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2017.09.008.

7. Manso, G. (2011). Motivating innovation. The Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1823-1860.

8. Dosi, G., Marengo, L., & Pasquali, C. (2006). How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? Research Policy, 35(8), 1110-1121.

9. Rao, N. (2016). Do tax credits stimulate R&D spending? The effect of the R&D tax credit in its first decade. Journal of Public Economics, 140, 1-12.

10. Duchin, R., Ozbas, O., & Sensoy, B. A. (2010). Costly external finance, corporate investment, and the subprime mortgage credit crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 97(3), 418-435.

11. Hangzhou Science and Technology Bureau, Hangzhou Finance Bureau. (2022). Notice on the issuance of “Several Policy Measures to Build the Preferred Place for the Transfer and Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements” (Hangkece [2022] No. 136).

12. Dong, Z. Y., & Li, C. M. (2021). Trend and path selection of high-quality development of “specialized and innovative” small and medium-sized enterprises. Reform, No. 332(10), 1-11.

13. Frenkel, A. (2000). Can regional policy affect firms’ innovation potential in lagging regions? The Annals of Regional Science, 34(3), 315-341.

14. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan S. (2003). Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 111(5), 1043-1075.

15. Deshpandé, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E. (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. The Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23-37.

16. Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. The Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-54.

17. Zheng, S. L. (2014). Institutional comfort and competition for high-tech talents: An analysis based on talent attraction strategies. Journal of Humanities, (09), 106-113. DOI: 10.15895/j.cnki.rwzz.2014.09.034.

18. Greve, H. R. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 685-702.

19. Carman, J. M., & Dominguez, L. V. (2001). Organizational transformations in transition economies: Hypotheses. Journal of Macromarketing, 21(2), 164-180.

20. Wu, J., & Tu, R. (2007). CEO stock option pay and R&D spending: A behavioral agency explanation. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 482-492.

21. Atanassov, J. (2013). Do hostile takeovers stifle innovation? Evidence from antitakeover legislation and corporate patenting. The Journal of Finance, 68(3), 1097-1131.

22. Wang, Y. B. (2021). Managerial overconfidence, market competition, and corporate innovation behavior [Doctoral dissertation, Jilin University]. DOI: 10.27162/d.cnki.gjlin.2021.000950.

23. Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (2007). Star scientists, innovation and regional and national immigration. National Bureau of Economic Research.

24. Cai, Z. M. (2022). The impact of tax incentives for high-tech enterprise certification on corporate innovation output [Doctoral dissertation, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics]. DOI: 10.27412/d.cnki.gxncu.2022.002679.

25. Chen, Z., Liu, Z., Serrato, J. C. S., et al. (2018). Notching R&D investment with corporate income tax cuts in China. National Bureau of Economic Research.

26. Yang, G. C., Liu, J., Lian, P., et al. (2017). Tax preferences, R&D manipulation and R&D performance. Economic Research Journal, 52(08), 110-124.

27. Li, W. J., & Zheng, M. N. (2016). Substantive innovation or strategic innovation?—The impact of macro-industrial policies on micro-enterprise innovation. Economic Research, 51(04), 60-73.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Management Research and Economic Development
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-469-9
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-470-5
Published Date
07 June 2024
Series
Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
ISSN (Print)
2754-1169
ISSN (Online)
2754-1177
DOI
10.54254/2754-1169/87/20240789
Copyright
07 June 2024
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated