Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis

Series Vol. 62 , 28 December 2023


Open Access | Article

The Impact of Different Financing Methods on Enterprise Performance: Evidence from Chinese High-tech Companies

Xiaoxuan Li * 1
1 Durham University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, Vol. 62, 91-104
Published 28 December 2023. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Xiaoxuan Li. The Impact of Different Financing Methods on Enterprise Performance: Evidence from Chinese High-tech Companies. AEMPS (2023) Vol. 62: 91-104. DOI: 10.54254/2754-1169/62/20231325.

Abstract

In the era of the new knowledge economy, high-tech industries are increasingly becoming an effective way and important means to promote a country's economic growth and sustainable social development. However, due to the high investment and high-risk operating characteristics of high-tech companies, they will face significant difficulties in the financing process, which can easily lead to the rupture of the capital chain and affect the normal operation of the enterprise. Financing structure has always been a key aspect of modern enterprise management. A reasonable financing structure can reduce financing costs, improve corporate governance structure, and promote the improvement of corporate performance. This article collects data from 2773 Chinese high-tech listed companies from 2017 to 2021 to study the impact of different financing methods on enterprise performance. The research results indicate that endogenous financing can promote the improvement of enterprise performance, while debt financing and equity financing have a negative impact on enterprise performance. Therefore, high-tech companies should improve their endogenous financing ability by improving their profit retention rate through scientific management. At the same time, the government should strengthen macroeconomic regulation, allocate market funds reasonably, and strengthen supervision of high-tech companies.

Keywords

financing methods, enterprise performance, high-tech Firms

References

1. Pronchakov, Y.; Prokhorov, O.; Fedorovich, O. Concept of High-Tech Enterprise Development Management in the Context of Digital Transformation. Computation 2022, 10(7): 118.

2. Liu, H.; Xing, F.; Li, B. et al. Does the high-tech enterprise certification policy promote innovation in China? Science and Public Policy 2020, 47(5): 678-688.

3. Cristescu, M. P.; Nerișanu, R. A. Sustainable Development with Schumpeter Extended Endogenous Type of Innovation and Statistics in European Countries. Sustainability 2021, 13(7): 3848.

4. Crudu, R. The role of innovative entrepreneurship in the economic development of EU member countries. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation 2019, 15(1): 35-60.

5. Zhong, Y. Research on the Current Situation and Optimization Strategies of Financing Issues for High-tech Manufacturing Enterprises - Taking Ningbo, Zhejiang Province as an Example. China Industry and Economics 2023, (12): 32-35.

6. Sun, Z.; Wang, X.; Liang, C.; Cao, F.; Wang, L. The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulation on innovation of high-tech enterprises in China: mediating and interaction effect. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2021, 28: 8323-8336.

7. Mandych, I.A.; Bykova, A.V. Trends in innovation and investment development of high-tech enterprises. Russian Technological Journal 2019, 7(5): 79-92.

8. Spitsin, V.; Vukovic, D.; Anokhin, S.; Spitsina, L. Company performance and optimal capital structure: evidence of transition economy (Russia). Journal of Economic Studies 2021, 48(2): 313-332.

9. Pelham, A.M.; Wilson, D.T. A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimensions of small-firm performance. Journal of the academy of marketing science 1995, 24(1): 27-43.

10. Frank, M.Z.; Goyal, V.K. Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. Journal of financial economics 2003, 67(2): 217-248.

11. Wang, H.; Liang, P.; Li, H.; Yang, R. Financing sources, R&D investment and enterprise risk. Procedia Computer Science 2016, 91: 122-130.

12. Dewaelheyns, N.; Van Hulle, C. Internal capital markets and capital structure: Bank versus internal debt. European Financial Management 2010, 16(3): 345-373.

13. Flor, C.R.; Hirth, S. Asset liquidity, corporate investment, and endogenous financing costs. Journal of Banking & Finance 2013, 37(2): 474-489.

14. Sasidharan, S.; Lukose, P. J.; Komera, S. Financing constraints and investments in R&D: Evidence from Indian manufacturing firms. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 2015, 55: 28-39.

15. Khan, M.K.; Kaleem, A.; Zulfiqar, S.; Akram, U. Innovation investment: behaviour of Chinese firms towards financing sources. International Journal of Innovation Management 2019, 23(07): 1950070.

16. Zeballos, A.C.; Seifert, R.W.; Protopappa-Sieke M. Financial Supply Chain Management: Working Capital Requirements with Short-term Debt. Computers & Operations Research 2013, 40(ARTICLE): 2940-2949.

17. Ni, J.; Chu, L.K.; Li, Q. Capacity decisions with debt financing: The effects of agency problem. European Journal of Operational Research 2017, 261(3): 1158-1169.

18. Haugen, R.A., Senbet, L.W. Bankruptcy and agency costs: Their significance to the theory of optimal capital structure. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 1988, 23(1): 27-38. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2331022

19. Michaelas, N.; Chittenden, F.; Poutziouris, P. Financial policy and capital structure choice in UK SMEs: Empirical evidence from company panel data. Small business economics 1999, 12: 113-130.

20. Menz, K.M. Corporate social responsibility: Is it rewarded by the corporate bond market? A critical note. Journal of Business Ethics 2010, 96(1): 117-134.

21. Hebous, S.; Ruf, M. Evaluating the effects of ACE systems on multinational debt financing and investment. Journal of Public Economics 2017, 156: 131-149.

22. Myers, S.C.; Majluf, N.S. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of financial economics 1984, 13(2): 187-221.

23. Hogan, T.; Hutson, E.; Drnevich, P. Drivers of external equity funding in small high-tech ventures. Journal of Small Business Management 2017, 55(2): 236-253.

24. Stulz, R.M. Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of financial Economics 1990, 26(1): 3-27.

25. Saeed, R.B.; Badar, R. Impact of capital structure on performance empirical evidence from sugar sector of Pakistan. European Journal of Business and Management 2013, 5(5): 78-86.

26. Feng, S.; Zhang, R.; Li, G. Environmental decentralization, digital finance and green technology innovation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 2022, 61: 70-83.

27. Stulz, R.M. Globalization, corporate finance, and the cost of capital. In Global Corporate Governance, 1st ed. Columbia University Press, 2009: 106-134.

28. Xinle, T.; Zhen, W.; Xinting, L. The influence of government subsidy on enterprise innovation: based on Chinese high-tech enterprises. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja 2022, 35(1): 1481-1499.

29. Freedman, D.M.; Nutting, M.R. Equity crowdfunding for investors: A guide to risks, returns, regulations, funding portals, due diligence, and deal terms, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons, America,2015; pp.57-60.

30. Ingley, C.B.; Van Der Walt, N.T. Corporate governance, institutional investors and conflicts of interest. Corporate Governance: an international review 2004, 12(4): 534-551.

31. Yuan, R.; Xiao, J.Z.; Milonas, N.; Zou, J.H. The role of financial institutions in the corporate governance of listed Chinese companies. British Journal of Management 2009, 20(4): 562-580.

32. Pan, X.; Zhang, J.; Song, M.; Ai, B. Innovation resources integration pattern in high-tech entrepreneurial enterprises. International entrepreneurship and management journal 2018, 14: 51-66.

33. O'Farrell, P.N.; Hitchens, D.M. Alternative theories of small-firm growth: a critical review. Environment and Planning A 1988, 20(10): 1365-1383.

34. Maguad, B.A. The modern quality movement: Origins, development and trends. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 2006, 17(2): 179-203.

35. Li, X. DuPont Analysis on the Financial Capacity of Midea and Gree Company. International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021), China, October 13, 2021.

36. Normand, C.; Wootton, C.W. The Recognition and Valuation of Current Assets on the Balance Sheet in the United States, 1865–1940. Accounting Historians Journal 2001, 28(2): 63-108.

37. Xie, D.; Deng, H. Practice of EVA-based balanced scorecard in the construction of performance evaluation system. Mobile Information Systems 2021, 2021.

38. Tortella, B.D.; Brusco, S. The Economic Value Added (EVA): an analysis of market reaction. Advances in Accounting 2003, 20: 265-290.

39. Goedhart, M.; Koller, T.; Wessels, D. Valuing high-tech companies. McKinsey Global Institute, 2016.

40. Feunou, B.; Jahan-Parvar, M.R.; Okou, C. Downside variance risk premium. Journal of Financial Econometrics 2018, 16(3): 341-383.

41. Lee, K.; Kim, M. Investor sentiment and bond risk premia: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 2019, 55(4): 915-933.

42. Xia, Q.; Qiu, Y.; Zhou, M. Economic regulations of coal enterprises’ scale expansion in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2018, 129: 366-372.

43. Modigliani, F.; Miller, M.H. The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American economic review 1958, 48(3): 261-297. Avaliable at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809766

44. Harash, E.; Al-Timimi, S.; Alsaadi, J. The influence of finance on performance of small and medium enterprises (SMES). Technology 2014, 4(3): 161-167.

45. Dewaelheyns, N., Van Hulle, C. Internal capital markets and capital structure: Bank versus internal debt. European Financial Management 2010, 16(3): 345-373.

46. Hebous, S.; Ruf, M. Evaluating the effects of ACE systems on multinational debt financing and investment. Journal of Public Economics 2017, 156: 131-149.

47. Jiang, E.L.; Yoon, S.M.; Suh, J.H. Corporate Tax Rate Cut on the Cost Behavior of High-tech Companies: The Case of China. Applied Economics 2023, 55(20): 2323-2336.

48. Yazdanfar, D.; Öhman, P. Debt financing and firm performance: an empirical study based on Swedish data. The Journal of Risk Finance 2015, 16(1): 102-118.

49. Ning, J.; Babich, V. R&D investments in the presence of knowledge spillover and debt financing: Can risk shifting cure free riding? Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 2018, 20(1): 97-112.

50. Schäfer, D.; Werwatz, A.; Zimmermann, V. The determinants of debt and (private) equity financing: The case of young, innovative SMEs from Germany. Industry and Innovation 2004, 11(3): 225-248.

51. Murhadi, W.R. Study on dividend policy: antecedent and its impact on share price. Available at SSRN 1686109, 2010.

52. Wei, Y. China's Capital Market and Corporate Governance: The Promotion of the External Governance Mechanism. Macquarie Journal of Business Law 2007, 4: 325-344.

53. Han, H.; Gu, X. Linkage between inclusive digital finance and high-tech enterprise innovation performance: role of debt and equity financing. Frontiers in psychology 2021, 12: 814408.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-225-1
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-226-8
Published Date
28 December 2023
Series
Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
ISSN (Print)
2754-1169
ISSN (Online)
2754-1177
DOI
10.54254/2754-1169/62/20231325
Copyright
28 December 2023
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated