Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Series Vol. 53 , 01 December 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
With the deepening of the academic research on behavioral finance, the theoretical system of noise trading is becoming more and more perfect. At present, however, is the so-called market noise trading on the relationship between the enterprise and the signal transmission utility and influence the research direction, there is no literature research and make a empirical report and a clear conclusion. On the basis of the existing noise measurement method, this article through to the selection of the Shanghai 50 index to determine the sample object, by industry, size, debt and growth ability determine the matching control samples, estimate the sampled stocks noise trading high frequency time series in the year of 2019; On this basis, using stepwise regression method and Spearman correlation coefficient method, the signal transmission noise deal for investors and enterprises the relationship between the utility and the empirical research. Research and analysis found that the current noise trading to enterprise's profit distribution and "merger and acquisition/significant contracts" two kind of announcement utility has obvious enhancement amplification; The noise trading on the first trading day after the release of the enterprise announcement signal will affect the utility multiple of the enterprise announcement. The conclusion of this paper is that investors' irrational noise trading will overreact to the announcement signals of listed companies, and bring unexpected effects to the market performance of listed companies. Enterprises should be especially cautious about the content and time of announcements on the premise of compliance.
noise trading, signaling utility, sample stocks, matching stock
1. Black, F. (1986). Noise. The journal of finance, 41(3), 528-543.
2. Trueman, B. (1988). A theory of noise trading in securities markets. The Journal of Finance, 43(1), 83-95.
3. Cipriani, M., & Guarino, A. (2005). Noise trading in a laboratory financial market: a maximum likelihood approach. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2-3), 315-321.
4. De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., & Waldmann, R. J. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets. Journal of political Economy, 98(4), 703-738.
5. Greene, J., & Smart, S. (1999). Liquidity provision and noise trading: Evidence from the “investment dartboard” column. The Journal of Finance, 54(5), 1885-1899.
6. Wang, F. A. (2010). Informed arbitrage with speculative noise trading. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(2), 304-313.
7. Gan, Y., Wu, J. & Xie, C. (1999). The Formation Mechanism, Consequences and Governance of financial market noise. Financial theory and practice, (5), 33-35.
8. Yang S G. (2002). Behavioral Finance, noise trading and the behavior characteristics of Chinese securities market entities. Economic Review, (4), 83-85.
9. Su Dongwei. (2008). Noise trading and market quality. Economic Research (09),82-95.
10. Yin H. (2010). The empirical study of noise trading affect stock market efficiency. Chinese journal of management sciences, newsroom. (eds.), the 12th China management science academic essays (pp. 337-342)..
11. Bu Hui, Xie Zheng, Li Jiahong & Wu Junjie.(2018). The impact of investor sentiment on Stock market based on Stock review. Journal of Management Science (04),86-101.
12. Yao Yuan, Zhong Qi, & Yao Beibei. (2019). A study on the relationship between investor sentiment and stock market volatility: An analysis of the relationship between noise trading and irrational stock market price volatility. Price Theory and Practice, (2), 92-95.
13. Li Zhanqi. (2021). Sensitivity analysis of noise traders to corporate information quality. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 869(8), 77-81.
14. WANG Mingtao & Sun Ximing... Trader limited rationality, information noise relationship and financial market information efficiency. Operation research and management.
15. Li Xuefeng, Wang Zhaoyu, & Li Jiaming. (2013). Noise trading and market progressive efficiency. Economics (Quarterly Journal), (2), 913-934.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).