Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis

Series Vol. 57 , 05 January 2024


Open Access | Article

Research on the Impact of Supply Chain Concentration, and Financial Flexibility on Corporate Innovation: An Empirical Study in the New Energy Industry

Yiyang Kong * 1
1 Transportation College, Jilin University, 5988 Renmin St, Changchun, China

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, Vol. 57, 146-152
Published 05 January 2024. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Yiyang Kong. Research on the Impact of Supply Chain Concentration, and Financial Flexibility on Corporate Innovation: An Empirical Study in the New Energy Industry. AEMPS (2024) Vol. 57: 146-152. DOI: 10.54254/2754-1169/57/20230698.

Abstract

With the gradual formation of an international consensus on carbon peaking and neutrality, the new energy industry is a key focus for future development. Still, the industry also suffers from a fiercely competitive market environment. Therefore, the innovation performance of enterprises is crucial. This paper analyzes the impact of supply chain relationships and financial flexibility on corporate innovation from a resource-based viewpoint. Moreover, several variables are introduced to explore the optimal combination of innovation strategies. In the empirical part of the study, the study selects the panel data of listed companies in China’s new energy industry. The fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis approach investigates how supply chain concentration, and financial flexibility affect corporate innovation. The study shows that: corporate cash is the main internal resource for R&D, industrial clusters facilitate the acquisition of external resources, and the configuration of the two can promote corporate innovation; debt and supply chain risk inhibit corporate.

Keywords

supply chain relationship, financial flexibility, innovation, fsQCA

References

1. Porter, M. E. (1992) Capital disadvantage: America's failing capital investment system. Harvard business review, 70(5), 65-82.

2. Bellamy, M. A., Ghosh, S., & Hora, M. (2014) The influence of supply network structure on firm innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 32(6), 357-373.

3. Campello, M., Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2010) The real effects of financial constraints: Evidence from a financial crisis. Journal of financial Economics, 97(3), 470-487.

4. Gamba, A., & Triantis, A. (2008). The value of financial flexibility. The journal of finance, 63(5), 2263-2296.

5. Cheng, J. L., & Kesner, I. F. (1997). Organizational slack and response to environmental shifts: The impact of resource allocation patterns. Journal of management, 23(1), 1-18.

6. Cuervo‐Cazurra, A., & Annique Un, C. (2010). Why some firms never invest in formal R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 31(7), 759-779.

7. Basole, R. C., Bellamy, M. A., & Park, H. (2017). Visualization of innovation in global supply chain networks. Decision Sciences, 48(2), 288-306.

8. Schildt, H., Keil, T., & Maula, M. (2012). The temporal effects of relative and firm‐level absorptive capacity on interorganizational learning. Strategic management journal, 33(10), 1154-1173.

9. Hammervoll, T. (2009). Value-creation logic in supply chain relationships. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 16(3), 220-241.

10. Boschma, R. A., & Lambooy, J. G. (2002). Knowledge, market structure, and economic coordination: dynamics of industrial districts. Growth and change, 33(3), 291-311.

11. Lonsdale, C. (2001). Locked-in to supplier dominance: on the dangers of asset specificity for the outsourcing decision. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(2), 22.

12. Dhaliwal, D., Judd, J. S., Serfling, M., & Shaikh, S. (2016). Customer concentration risk and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 23-48.

13. Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management science, 52(1), 68-82.

14. Kale, J. R., & Shahrur, H. (2008). Corporate leverage and specialized investments by customers and suppliers. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 20(4), 98-104.

15. Le, T. V., & O'Brien, J. P. (2010). Can two wrongs make a right? State ownership and debt in a transition economy. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1297-1316.

16. Brown, J. R., Fazzari, S. M., & Petersen, B. C. (2009). Financing innovation and growth: Cash flow, external equity, and the 1990s R&D boom. The Journal of Finance, 64(1), 151-185.

17. Billett, M. T., King, T. H. D., & Mauer, D. C. (2007). Growth opportunities and the choice of leverage, debt maturity, and covenants. the Journal of Finance, 62(2), 697-730.

18. Zschoch, M. A. (2011). Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, Benoit Rihoux and Charles Ragin, eds., Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications, 2009, pp. xxv, 209. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 44(3), 743-746.

19. Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of management journal, 54(2), 393-420.

20. Jiang, S., Yeung, A. C., Han, Z., & Huo, B. (2023). The effect of customer and supplier concentrations on firm resilience during the COVID‐19 pandemic: resource dependence and power balancing. Journal of Operations Management, 69(3), 497-518.

21. Ayers, B. C., Ramalingegowda, S., & Yeung, P. E. (2011). Hometown advantage: The effects of monitoring institution location on financial reporting discretion. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(1), 41-61.

22. Brown, J. R., Martinsson, G., & Petersen, B. C. (2013). Law, stock markets, and innovation. The Journal of Finance, 68(4), 1517-1549.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Financial Technology and Business Analysis
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-205-3
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-206-0
Published Date
05 January 2024
Series
Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences
ISSN (Print)
2754-1169
ISSN (Online)
2754-1177
DOI
10.54254/2754-1169/57/20230698
Copyright
05 January 2024
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated